> Home
> Classroom examples
> SREB Readiness Indicators
> What the
experts say

Webtours
visit the NEIRTEC website
Return to:   |   << Using this Site for Professional Development   |

Using this Site for Professional Development

Organization of Mission: Algebra

Three inter-related questions form the basis for the three elements of the Mission: Algebra website.

  1. What are the priority topics for student mathematics learning in the middle grades that are essential for success with formal Algebra I course?
    See SREB Content-Specific Readiness Indicators.
    These 12 content-specific readiness indicators can be used to guide a strong middle grades mathematics program. They are taken from a report published by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), Getting Students Ready for Algebra I: What Middle Grades Students Need to Know and Be Able to Do. When working with mathematics teachers, start with this page to ground the workshop in an issue that these teachers care about: the improvement of instruction. It is helpful to ask: which of these priorities for the instructional content are ones that agree with your experience of students' needs?
  2. How can technology support good mathematics teaching and learning for these priority topics?
    See Standards-based Classroom Examples
    Here you will find 12 vignettes that show middle grades teachers using specific applications of technology. These vignettes will help you initiate discussions about how a teacher uses technology in a classroom setting:
     
    • What specific learning outcomes is each teacher trying to achieve?
    • How does technology help them to achieve this goal more effectively?
    • How can they assess their students’ learning?
    • How is the class organized? Are students working as a whole class? as a small group? individually?
    • What follow-up is appropriate?

    Starting the discussion by analyzing other teachers’ lessons provides a safe ground for participants to explore their own beliefs, teaching practices, and possible ways of developing their teaching skills and repertoire.

    Look in the Classroom
    In this section of each Classroom Example we show how a skilled teacher uses technology to teach his or her students. In addition to the dialog between teacher and students, each vignette is designed to reveal the teacher’s thinking process and to paint a rich picture of standards-based classroom practice in the hands of a skillful teacher.

    The Value of This Technology
    Each vignette also includes a section, The Value of This Technology, that can be used to stimulate participants’ thinking about how to enhance or create teaching and learning opportunities through the use of technology. If you have your workshop participants doing one of the hands-on activities using technology, then the debrief might include discussion of the value added by the technology followed by a reading of the relevant sections of the Classroom Example.

    Of the technology applications showcased in the 12 classroom examples, six are accessible through the Web and only require a browser such as Internet Explorer. The other six require the purchase of a particular piece of software, e.g., Geometer’s Sketchpad or Excel, or a tool such as a calculator.

  3. From a research perspective, how much is known about the role of technology in supporting student learning?
    See What the Experts Say

    If your participants include school and/or district decision-makers (e.g., principals, district directors of mathematics, mathematics department chairs/coordinators), the resources in this section will be of great relevance).

    There are two kinds of expert resources in this section. First, there are researchers, persons active in the field of educational technology who possess a decade or more of experience testing specific approaches; their experience can be very valuable. The Interviews section of this site includes transcripts of interviews conducted with two of these researchers—Judah Schwartz (Professor Emeritus and software author) and Jim Kaput (Professor of Mathematics and founder of Algebra Working Group)—and their comments are of broad relevance for mathematics educators. Parts of each interview are also presented as three- to five-minute sound clips selected to generate discussion among workshop participants. Jim Kaput talks about issues such as evidence of the positive impact of technology on student learning, prognoses for the roles of various kinds of technology in the future classrooms, and the impact of technology on the enacted curriculum. Judah Schwartz talks about research evidence for technology as a useful tool for inquiry learning and investigation. He also talks about his own educational software, one example of which, called "What Do You Do With a Broken Calculator?" (Sunburst Technology, Inc.), is noted in Classroom Example #3. Judah talks about important changes that need to happen in the teaching of mathematics at the middle grades level and how technology can help these changes to occur.

    Second, in Guidance from Expert Panels, we summarize briefly three important national reports. Each report reflects the result of thorough, carefully reviewed work of an expert panel and reflects a consensus of a group of national experts on the questions that they address. This consensus is largely consistent across the three reports and contains information that will be useful to district and school decision-makers.

    • Getting Students Ready for Algebra I, a report published by the Southern Regional Education Board (SREB), provides the 12 “content-specific readiness indicators” that we used as the organizing structure for this website.
    • NTCM’s Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000) emphasizes the importance of every student having access to technology and to a teacher skilled in its use. The NCTM Technology Principle is described; from this principle, we have extracted seven qualities of technology that could help improve mathematics instruction (see Qualities of Technology that Support Good Learning Practices in Mathematics)
    • The Expert Panel on Educational Technology designed and tested a model for defining the quality of programs that use educational technology. This framework—model, rubrics, criteria, and indicators for each criteria—is now available and of potential help to district leaders in creating programs in their districts that are likely to be significant in their impact and sustainable over time.

    The three key parts of the site—Classroom Examples, SREB Readiness indicators, and What the Experts Say—are always accessible from the left hand navigation bar as you work you way through the site.

    While each of the major areas of the site can be used by itself, they have been carefully constructed to support each other. The Mission: Algebra home page illustrates this inter-relationship around the concept of probability. We have created a chart that shows in detail the relationship among the three parts of the website; this chart will be helpful in planning professional development activities.

    For further help in understanding the organization of the Mission: Algebra website, we invite you to listen to a multimedia recording of a webtour that NEIRTEC staff presented to online participants in March 2005.

    The following three workshop scenarios are designed to help inform leaders of professional development about a range of uses for the Mission: Algebra website and to stimulate their own thinking about how to use the ideas and materials from this website to improve middle grades mathematics in their own district. As with all good professional development, your workshops should link as closely as possible to existing school and/or district initiatives. Workshops that focus on technology as technology are increasingly seen as irrelevant by teachers; workshops that use technology to help reach important school and/or district goals have a much better chance of reaching teachers on issues they think are important and therefore care about.

Printer-friendly version

> Next...